Sunday, November 24, 2013

Boston Shoemaker: Pelatiah Rea at the Old State House, c. 1810


I saw these beguiling pink leather slippers on my recent visit to Historic Deerfield. While I am still researching the shoemaker, Pelatiah Rea and his "Variety Shoe Store," the existence of a labeled Boston shoe from the early 19th century is a true find. According to catalog information, Rae may have been born in 1771, married Patty Rolf in 1795 and Emily Powers in 1821 - all in Boston.

The shoes themselves have a delicate, winsome quality. The pink leather shows use, and the imprint of the wearer's foot. The leather sole is very thin and clearly good for indoors or dancing. They certainly would never have lasted in the New England winters. The label is revealing as well to the careful reader. The term "Variety Shoe Store" has a more contemporary sensibility, indicating a wide selection from which to choose. In a clever tactic to bring consumers into the shop, Rea notes "Rips mended gratis." Finally, though it is only the early years of the 19th century, the location is near the "Old State House." The 'new' Statehouse had just been completed in 1798 by architect Charles Bulfinch (1763-1844). Throughout the 19th century, the original downtown core of Boston became associated with the older, densely populated parts of the city. The commercial center would become more linear, shifting down Washington Street (present day downtown crossing).


I thought readers might enjoy installation photos of the shoes on exhibit - as an added incentive to visit the "Celebrating Fiber Arts" exhibit currently on view through December 29, 2013.


All images are courtesy of Historic Deerfield.

Friday, November 22, 2013

Soucis d'hanneton, or Soucil de hanneton, or floss-fringe, or fly-fringe


William Hogarth, A Fishing Party, 1730-31
It would be so much easier if the names of things came with a history, “fly-fringe” is the problem of the moment.  A simple piece of passementerie, easily made and applied either as a bon mot or as a string or cluster of trim, the name seems to refer to fishing and hand-tied lures, but is it?   There is no doubt as to its existence in the 18th century, but the name shifts over time. The earliest references, using the term ‘fly-fringe” that have surfaced so far are from the beginning of the 20th Century.  On page 399 of The Lady’s Realm, London, volume 14 (1903) there is a description of an 18th century gown that uses the term fly-fringe to describe the trim.  The Century Dictionary, NYC (1906), page 2295 defines it as, “A trimming for women’s dress worn toward the close of the eighteenth century. It was made of floss-silk, the spreading and projecting tassels of which were suppose to resemble flies.”  According to the crafting site of Colonial Williamsburg the term for this type of decoration in the 18th century was floss fringe.http://www.cvent.com/events/millinery-through-time/custom-19-4d9531e095d844c391bc08c69ac3da91.aspx  The Two Nerdy History Girls in their blog of January 13, 2013 mention the use of the term French fringe during the eighteenth-century.http://twonerdyhistorygirls.blogspot.com/2013/01/making-18th-c-floss-fringe-for-gown.html  


On to France…..The French use the term soucil de hanneton to for this style of fringe, which translates as the eyebrow of the cockchafer, or May beetle. In the fourth edition of the Dictionnaire de L'Académie française (1762) one of the definitions of soucis d’hanneton is, “Les Frangers appellent Soucis d'hanneton, Des franges qui portent de petites houppes.”  This translates roughly as, “The fringes known as Soucis d’hanneton are small tassels.” Houppes can be tassels, or tufts or puffs take your pick.  Regardless of the nomenclature, by 1762 the phrase was used for a specific type of trim.  (Please note the shift in French usage from 1762’s “soucis d” to the 20th century’s “soucil de,” is not a typographical error.)  The European May Beetle is not the American May Beetle; they are two distinct families.  The European was invasive and very common in the spring, thus a visually well known insect.  So what does one look like….

Hanneton (fr) or Cockchafer (eng) or May Beetle or Bug
Looking beyond the bug, which has a certain charm, imagine the two antennae, which are the large orange fan-like projections as a silk strands joined together with a knot in the middle—fly fringe or soucil de hanneton. I really like idiomatic descriptions and this is a great one—beetlebrow for silk trim.


Pieces from 18th century dresses, the white pieces have sourcil de hannneton applied discriminately to the edges.


The French still use this term to describe this trim, but English speakers do not. Whether or not we retain foreign words or phrases seems to have no logic.  The May Beetle was as well known in the UK as in France, so why not keep the name?  It may be that the finished product resembled the hand tied flies used in fishing as much as they did to a beetle’s brow to the British.  Certainly to an American who had no experience with the European beetle there would have been no connection to tie the image and a word together—a fly would do as well, or even better than a beetle to describe the fringe.


Fly Fringe
http://www.olddairysaddlery.co.uk/horse_fly_masks.php




Unfortunately this is all conjecture, at the moment there seems to be no direct connections between the use of the term fly-fringe and the 18th century.  Compounding this is that the term fly-fringe most directly relates to the fringed band or crocheted bonnet that horses wear to keep flies away from their faces and is known as fly fringe.   Take your pick horses or fishing, both were pursuits open to women in the 18th century and may have ultimately provided the term fly-fringe.  Certainly by the beginning of the last century the notion that the trim resembled flies was solid enough that it required no further definition when used in The Ladies Realm article.  That being said the 18th century term most resembling the technique is soucil de hanneton, but I don’t see that one overtaking fly fringe in the near future. 
  
Jeffrey Hopper is an author and editor who blogs about men's wear and related topics for SilkDamask. You may reach him at this site.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Boot and Shoemakers to Queen Victoria: Cundry and Sons, London



Boot and shoemakers Cundry & Sons, located at Soho Square, enjoyed the patronage of Queen Victoria (as well as other members of the Royal family) for a number of years. I have written previously on these makers regarding her 1840 wedding slippers, one of the highlights of the Northampton Shoe Museum (See: http://silkdamask.blogspot.com/2012/09/whats-in-label-3-queen-victorias-1840.html) Given Queen Victoria's keen understanding that she could encourage patronage of UK designers through her personal selections (such as her use of Honiton lace for her wedding gown as an attempt to assist the flagging lace making industry), it was not surprising to see another pair by the same London shoemakers as part of her footwear collection.

Made for her after the wedding slippers, a similar pair (1840-48) is housed in the collection of www.ScienceMuseum.uk.org (Object A135559) According to both sites, Queen Victoria had nine-inch feet, which translates in approximately a size 5-5.5 (USA),  3–3.5 (UK) and 35.5 (EU) in today’s sizes. The gold trim, laid in "stripes"contrasts elegantly with the cream satin slippers. The diminutive rosette and dainty ankle ribbons add to the well balanced composition. The thin leather soles, delicate construction and fabric indicates they were clearly intended for dancing or indoor use. 


In Boyle's Fashionable Court and Country Guide, the boot and shoemakers are still listed in the 1857 directory:
CUNDRY and SON No 1 Soho square By Appointment in Ordinary to the Queen the Prince of Wales HRH the Duchess of Kent and the Royal Family Every variety of Ladies and Children's Boots and Shoes in the first style of materials and workmanship 




Illustrations:

QueenVictoria's slippers, c. 1840s, with makers label, Cundry & Sons, Shoemakers
Courtesy, www.ScienceMuseum.org.uk

QueenVictoria's wedding slippers, 1840s with makers label, Cundry & Sons, Shoemakers
Courtesy, www.northampton.gov.uk

Friday, November 15, 2013

Cotton, Linen, Silk, Wool: Celebrating Fiber Arts at Historic Deerfield

This past weekend, while visiting my older daughter at UMass-Amherst, I had the opportunity to spend a truly exceptional afternoon at Historic Deerfield (Deerfield, MA), attending the "Celebrating Fiber Arts" exhibition.  Located in the Helen Geier Flynt Center, I had reason to anticipate a delightful excursion through these collections.  On a previous visit in 2011, I had presented a paper on Georgian architecture and design at the annual fall symposium.  More recently, I visited the textile collection and immersed myself in the fabulous footwear for my current research on Georgian shoes in Colonial America.

            This visit was decidedly different: I was there to savor, discover, and, simply, enjoy. No time frame or pressing goals to be met. No one else present in the gallery, leaving me the opportunity to immerse myself in the surroundings without the need to jostle for a perch. So many aspects of this installation and its rubric of space make it noteworthy. I find compelling the fact that the primary textiles associated with historic garments have been organized thematically: cotton, linen, silk and wool. Within this format, the curatorial staff introduces select items or recent acquisitions each season, on a rotating basis. This was my second visit to the "rotation," and I found it just as interesting as the first. While I enjoy blockbuster fashion exhibits as much as anyone, the intimacy of the space and the careful – might I say reverential? - selection of objects (38 according to press materials) allowed the liberties of close inspection and reflective inquiry. Despite working closely with museum collections for over 25 years, I felt as though I was making new discoveries with each step.

Do put this in your planner – the exhibition closes on December 29th!

A few of my favorite "interactions." All photos are courtesy of Historic Deerfield (www.Historic-Deerfield.org) and a list of captions may be found at the end of this post.






And the shoes? Stay tuned…


The author thankNed Lazaro, Collections Manager and Associate Curator of Textiles, for his assistance.

Illustrations:
- Court dress, blue & white silk brocade, woven in Lyon, France, c.1760. Note expansive panniers.
- Detail, blue & white silk brocade Court dress with "fly” or floss fringe, c.1760.
- Man's early 19thc. linen plain weave shirt. Fabric, probably England; garment, probably American.
- English or American corset, 1820-1830, bleached satin weave cotton and twill weave cotton tape. The grommets are of ivory. Acc.# F.310
- Ladies' wallet or pocketbook (1750-1800) is rare in that it is attached to a known maker, Rebecca Kingsbury (1713-1807) of Dedham, MA. Rebecca was a schoolteacher in the 1730s before marrying Nathan Gay in 1740. Wool, silk, linen & pasteboard.

###  #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### ###
Historic Deerfield’s costume and textile collection has long been considered one of the finest in America.  Begun by the museum’s founder, Helen Geier Flynt, the collection features a vast array of costumes, needlework and domestic textiles which are displayed on a rotating basis.  Newly installed in this permanent gallery for the season are 38 exciting examples of American and European clothing, accessories, textiles and needlework from the 17th century through the mid-20th century.   

See more at:


Thursday, November 14, 2013

The Other Civil War: 17th Century Armor at the Higgins Armory Museum


Cuirassier, Netherlands or Savoy 1620-45 (author’s photo)
This past weekend, after many years of talking about it, we went with friends to the Higgins Armory Museum in Worcester, Massachusetts.  It has been open for 83 years in a building designed to house the collection, but financial demands have forced the board to close the museum at the end of 2013.  However, the collection will be transferred to the Worcester Art Museum where a library will be converted into new gallery space to house the collection and the library will move to new quarters.  So at least the collection will remain in the New England. As a child I had knights and a castle, so this was a delightful afternoon. I knew that armor was used for centuries, but it was the section of mid-sixteenth century armor the struck a cord.

Pikeman circa 1630 (author’s photo)

The distance between the 1640s and the 1740s is in certain ways immeasurable (the divine right of kings and the modern political era is one example), but thinking specifically about the years 1646 and 1746 took me aback for a moment.  As fate would have it, in 1646 Charles I was still trying, albeit unsuccessfully, to contain the revolutionary forces that would eventually unseat and behead him and in 1746 George II was in pursuit of Charles Stuart better known as Bonnie Prince Charlie, the great grandson of Charles I, in order to maintain his crown and the Hanoverian line.  In those one hundred years troops in woolen redcoats replaced regiments in armor, and the battles that consumed nations now consumed fields. I find it somewhat ironic that the redcoat that began with the Parliamentarian forces of the Civil War (1640s) would in time signify the King’s own troops (1740s), but history is full of such details.

As I looked at the armor and the martial paintings that accompanied it, I wondered, in addition to all the other factors that influence how we perceive and dress ourselves, if the defeat of the Stuarts was one of those watershed moments that go unnoticed.  Was this the end of the fantasy of the feudal order and all of its accoutrements?  The sword, a significant and evolved feudal emblem as any, was still used by some, but not required outside of the Court, a sure measure of its decline.  Certainly by the 1750 the attitude in men’s clothing began the slide toward dominant and increasingly conservative uniform--the suit.  While the fabric of men’s clothing during the second half of the long eighteenth century might still be more decorative than any modern concoction, the flair began to subside particularly with the growth of the middle-class.  Was the defeat of the Stuart pretensions the last nail in the coffin of the medieval and renaissance ostentatious male display? It is hard to say, but the distance between 1646 and 1746 was never so apparent to me as it was on that Saturday afternoon.

From the Museum of London’s Collecton file:
This uniform was worn by the British Army officer, Richard St George. He was a Colonel in the 20th Regiment of Foot between 1737 and 1740 and later commanded the 8th Dragoons until 1755. Dragoons were trained to ride on horseback but to fight on foot as infantrymen. St George may have served at the Battle of Dettingen during the War of the Austrian Succession.
 http://collections.museumoflondon.org.uk/Online/object.aspx?objectID=object-85982&start=194&rows=1

This all leads to the last thought of this exercise and that is, a question that often is asked of museums, or rather the employees of museums...“What was the point of the exhibit and did it reach its intended audience?”  I can’t think that anyone really sat down and created an exhibit to trigger my experience with 17th century armor.  That to me is the telling bit; education or the sharing of information is informed as much by the knowledge of the audience as it is by the knowledge of the institution and that the unintended outcome, although seemingly valueless to the perceived outcome, is of importance, at least the mind engaged with it.  Would I have made the connection without the exhibit, perhaps, but as I am not surrounded by either the 17th or 18th centuries, I think it would have taken longer, if at all.  After all, information without connection is simply a list of facts.

Now a simple repast,

Helmutt the dog in modern armor created at the Met in 1942 and based on a 16th century example at the Higgins Armory Museum.  Even your best friend could go out in style. (Author’s photo)

Jeffrey Hopper is an editor, author and museum professional who blogs about men's wear and related topics. You can reach him at this site.

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Hoho Birds and Dancing Jesters: Italian Dress Epitomizes the Late Baroque/Rococo Style, c. 1725-1740



All images are courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art
Acc. #: 1993.17a, b
This lively Italian Late Baroque embroidered linen dress (c. 1725-1740) epitomizes the characteristics of the period: exaggerated, large scale motifs and easily accessible details. Add to this a sense of movement, depth, high color, and they all combine to create drama, exuberance & grandeur! The dress suggests a theater or an opera narrative. Beginning in Rome around 1600, by the early 18th century, the style was pervasive in the Western world.  By the time this garment was complete a transition to the Rococo was well underway. Whether we view it as a form of music, art, architecture, theatre or fashion this dress embodies the époque.

Look closely at the scale of the figures along the lower portion of the dress. Full of flourish, the dancing jesters, holding flowers rather than scepters, would have been recognized in most parts of the early 18th century world by the elite (who were wealthy enough to have such extensive ornament decorate their garments.) The figures are intertwined with fantastical phoenix-like creatures (known as Hoho birds, Asian symbols of good fortune), large-scale, brightly-hued flowers, references to Chinoiserie and elaborate foreign, dream-like landscapes. Note the attention to detail of the jester's clothing: vibrant tunics with pointed hems and sleeves, traditional cap with bells. 






As mentioned above, the figures are entwined with the Hoho birds. Some of the best examples of these carved creatures are at the National Trust's Claydon House (1751-1771). They carved of wood by Luke Lightfoot, responsible for most of the astounding Rococo carving throughout.



For an information and image rich piece on Claydon House and its carvings, see Carolyne Roehm:
http://carolyneroehm.com/2013/07/12/total-inspiration-claydon-house-2/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CarolyneRoehm+(Carolyne+Roehm)


For more details on the linen dress, see:
http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/search-the-collections/82461?img=2#fullscreen
Metropolitan Museum, Acc. #: 1993.17a, b @Metropolitan Museum of Art

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Love & Loss in the Letters of a Young Woman in Rural New England, 1794-1817: Historical New Hampshire, Fall/Winter 2013

"The Landing of Columbus in America Wrought by Margaret
Mitchell at Mrs. Rowson's Academy"
Courtesy, New Hampshire Historical Society
In a quiet corner of New England, in a large but unassuming Georgian home, during the early years of the new nation, lived a young woman whose life was typically New England—and, yet, surprisingly unfamiliar to most New Englanders. Her name was Myra Montgomery (1794-1817), and her abbreviated life of twenty-two years was played out along the Connecticut River, where she learned to ride and sleigh along cornfields, and in Boston, where she learned literature and the finer arts of genteel society at Mrs. Rowson’s Female Academy. 
Few of us who know and love the history of this region realize that the lives and loves of those who came before us spanned the hundreds of miles of unpaved post roads that connected one corner of our region to another.  This is Myra’s story. I have had the good fortune to work with this previously unpublished cache of letters. They reveal her joys and sorrows; her erudite use of the pen and playful language, her hopes and disappointments. We come to know her as an intelligent young woman of the early republic, who is looking forward to travel beyond her childhood home and marriage to Horace Henry Goodman, her fiancé. All were cut short by her death of consumption at age twenty-two.
One of the Montgomery girls, probably Myra.
Courtesy, Haverhill Historical Society
We can still enter her world. In addition to the letters themselves, the Montgomery House (c. 1793) still stands. Here, we can find Myra’s bedroom on second floor, adorned with stenciled walls, where she penned her letters to Horace. The classic Georgian vernacular structure has only had five owners, and the current residents are gracious and are always happy to open their lovely home.
General Montgomery's Store (foreground) and the Montgomery Homestead beyond
If you would like to learn more about the life of this young woman and her early 19th century world, you may purchase individual copies of Historical New Hampshire, Fall/Winter 2013, Donna-Belle Garvin, Editor.

To order a copy:
Online: New Hampshire Historical Society's website, www.nhhistory.org
Telephone: 603-856-0625